Revisiting LaTeX

Question

A while back, people asked about whether to include LaTeX formatting on PCG.SE. The answer was generally no, because people believed that the filesize was too big and had too much of an effect on loading time.

But then Puzzling.SE got LaTeX support added, which was a few months after that question was last updated. I'm wondering whether it would be a good idea to reconsider bringing LaTeX to PCG.SE, since a lot of the programming puzzles I've personally written would definitely benefit from LaTeX notation:

• Find a point's position on the integral Hilbert curve

• Build a pair of spies that will throw stones into a river

• Prisoner's Dilemma v.2 - Battle Royale

• Build a MU puzzle solver

• Print a specific value in this generated binary matrix

• Build an adding machine, multiplying machine, minifloat adding machine, bit-counting comparator, and 2-way universal logic processor using NAND logic gates

• Write a function that reduces compositions of linear operators

• Build a solver for the cow-and-chicken problem

• Build an evaluator for nontrivial resistor diagrams

Note that some of these questions also use code notation that should stay code notation; however, there are significantly many bits and pieces that would be preferable to format in LaTeX.

Answer 1

I've now enabled the MathJax setting here. Enjoy!

Answer 2

First off, your questions use the existing formatting tools expertly; they all seem to clearly describe the problem at hand. I can certainly picture how LaTeX would allow more mathematical explanations and nicer-looking matrices. However, I think MathJax is overkill for this site.

For one thing, it wouldn't be used much in answers.* Afterall, code golf answers are typically written in code, not mathematical notation. Contrast that to Puzzling where good answers might need to bring math into play even when the question shows no obvious indication it might be required.

While mathematics is the lingua franca of algorithms, among programmers pseudocode tends to be more commonly used. So it feels like MathJax is a poor fit for this topic. Are there algorithms that are difficult or impossible to express in pseudocode?

---

* I did see this fine answer as the exception that proves the rule.