Skip to main content

Timeline for Sandbox for Proposed Challenges

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
Oct 26, 2016 at 23:52 comment added Destructible Lemon If using a language with nops, [hello world program][arbitrary number of nops] will be even worse than xnors example
Oct 25, 2016 at 17:18 comment added Dada @xnor indeed. I was worried (cf question 4 for the sandbox) that something like that could be possible, and it obviously is. So ask for all the possible permutations to be valid would be a better challenge? Or should I just drop that challenge?
Oct 25, 2016 at 17:16 comment added xnor Something like print"Hello World";123456789123456789 still produces a huge number of permutations.
Oct 25, 2016 at 10:49 comment added Sp3000 Oh right, jumped the gun and missed that sentence. In that case I think you can use Lenguage instead? (since it's basically Unary but you can choose the chars)
Oct 25, 2016 at 7:30 comment added Dada @Sp3000 Thanks for your comment. I think that this sentence Note that only permutations that produce a code that differs from the previous ones should be considered (which I wrote right after the examples) will prevent Unary to win since it will have 0 valid permutations.
Oct 24, 2016 at 23:07 comment added Sp3000 If I've read this challenge correctly, Unary is going to win with (astronomical number) divided by (astronomical number factorial). Of course, this could still be a good challenge in other languages regardless, but the scoring as is means that it's beneficial to pad the program as long as possible since the denominator grows factorially compared to the linear numerator - so yeah I think a different scoring method might be necessary (no good ideas off the top of my head though)
Oct 24, 2016 at 22:21 history answered Dada CC BY-SA 3.0