Timeline for Reopen my question that has several correct answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 3, 2017 at 16:43 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 15, 2016 at 22:38 | comment | added | user63187 | It was fixed by the time you posted the comment. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 22:35 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @ChristopherPeart I voted to close in the queue, and no, you hadn't fixed everything. You had said things like "I don't care which" and you weren't specific on the output. See the answer below. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 22:34 | comment | added | user63187 | I read the comments @mbomb007 and fixed it. So please stop saying that I didn't fix it according to comments | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 22:29 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @redstarcoder Closing is not "slamming". It simply makes it so that no new answers may be posted, thus giving the OP more time to fix his question according to the comments. If they had read the comments and provided fixes, they wouldn't have had two closes. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 21:32 | comment | added | redstarcoder |
@mbomb007 I think the input requirement of BABA was clear, as it was defined in the question explicitly so, but especially as all the other answers used BABA. I think raising the issue of what the Konami code actually is, is what created any uncertainty. I found the input/output requirements clear, but my point is, I didn't see any of the closevoters saying they found the input/output requirements unclear before. We should be helping and encouraging new members, not slamming them with two closes and 24 hours + a meta post later they get some feedback, that's all I'm trying to say.
|
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 20:44 | comment | added | mbomb007 |
@redstarcoder That's not true. The question was still unclear whether it should be BABA or BA at the end. (The question said BABA, but the real Konami code only has BA at the end). Also, the other input/output requirements were still vague.
|
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 17:23 | comment | added | redstarcoder | I just want to point out the question had issues raised, they were fixed, the question was closed after the raised issues got fixed, the question got re-opened, and it got closed again with no new issues raised. So regardless if questions aren't closed for no reason, it's still very true that OP wasn't given any by the time he created this meta post. This should never happen, especially not to new members. It really hurts the fun of the place. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 17:01 | history | edited | user63187 |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 17:01 | history | edited | Geobits |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:53 | comment | added | Rainbolt | I think it would help if a mod cleaned up the comments that have obviously been addressed, leaving only those that are still an issue. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:50 | comment | added | tuskiomi | @Rainbolt ah, so there have been improvements. I think I can look over them and decide. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:48 | comment | added | Rainbolt | @tuskiomi Look at the revision history on the challenge. I think you'll find that some improvements have been made. OP just needs clarity on what problems still need to be fixed. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:45 | answer | added | Addison Crump | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:40 | comment | added | user63187 | For the 2nd time nothing as even redstarcoder can't find what is wrong. Nothing I can see is unclear and I have not gotten anything in feedback from the flaggers. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:39 | comment | added | tuskiomi | what have you done to remedy this? Questions are not closed for no reason. if you have improved understanding and clarity in some way, we can probably help you. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:23 | history | asked | user63187 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |