Timeline for Is Wolfram|Alpha a valid language?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:28 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Feb 21, 2017 at 22:11 | comment | added | LegionMammal978 | @StewieGriffin Yes, that was the post I was referring to. | |
| Feb 21, 2017 at 21:15 | comment | added | Stewie Griffin | @LegionMammal978, the link is broken. I'm assuming it's this post? | |
| Feb 21, 2017 at 14:42 | comment | added | Martin Ender Mod | Might be worth mentioning that the stuff you enter into Wolfram Alpha is not the Wolfram Language. The Wolfram Language is what most people call Mathematica and Mathematica is one implementation of that language. Under the hood W|A also uses WL afaik, but the queries you enter are first processed by something W|A specific before WL-code is generated from that. | |
| Feb 21, 2017 at 9:59 | history | edited | Stewie Griffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 520 characters in body
|
| Feb 20, 2017 at 8:06 | comment | added | Stewie Griffin | In that case, won't the language be Mathematica, and the program fetches results from the internet? | |
| Feb 20, 2017 at 8:03 | comment | added | Pavel |
Actually, you can make W|A queries with a single, concrete result. In Mathematica, enter Free-form Input mode with =. It will lookup your query with W|A and return a single result. On the other hand, this can be argued to just be the Wolfram Language with = prepended to whatever your query was.
|
|
| Feb 19, 2017 at 23:26 | history | edited | Stewie Griffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Feb 19, 2017 at 22:12 | history | edited | Stewie Griffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 158 characters in body
|
| Feb 19, 2017 at 21:23 | history | answered | Stewie Griffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |