Timeline for Are baseline submissions serious contenders?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 26, 2018 at 10:13 | history | edited | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Spelling fixes
|
Jan 17, 2018 at 7:14 | comment | added | daniero | Also, we still have an objective winning criteria, so a winner can and should be chosen with the "accept" button | |
Jan 17, 2018 at 6:36 | comment | added | daniero | I get that @PeterTaylor. I'm trying to drag discussion in another direction because I think the very premise of the discussion is off. | |
Jan 16, 2018 at 23:01 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | Since the very beginning this has been a contest site, not a catalogue site. You're asking for a significant change in scope. (And FWIW the word "catalogue" in itself carries baggage: on this site it has sufficient history of being used as a justification for posting crap). | |
Jan 16, 2018 at 22:59 | comment | added | Nathan Merrill | I agree with the majority and the sentiment of this post: Let's not kill creativity and interesting submissions. However, your last sentence is too strong for me. I don't think that any original idea is worth keeping. If there was a submission that randomly picked a letters (or tried to pick the wrong letters), I don't think that it would be worth keeping, even though it would be original. | |
Jan 16, 2018 at 21:12 | history | edited | daniero | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added TL;DR. Fixed typo
|
Jan 16, 2018 at 21:02 | history | answered | daniero | CC BY-SA 3.0 |