Timeline for Sandbox for Proposed Challenges
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
27 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 at 16:46 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 7730 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2018 at 2:48 | comment | added | user202729 | @DJMcMayhem So you're measuring effort? That's usually not a good idea. | |
| Jul 12, 2018 at 23:42 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2018 at 20:48 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 37 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2018 at 20:26 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 37 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2018 at 20:19 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 189 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2018 at 20:04 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 189 characters in body
|
| Jul 12, 2018 at 19:14 | comment | added | DJMcMayhem Mod | @user202729 For context, I said that in response to a 1-sentence sandbox post. I also said it bothers me when people "just post the bare minimum they can get by with and edit it later". The first revision of this challenge was clearly not the bare minimum to get by with. | |
| Jul 12, 2018 at 19:05 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | I definitely disagree with having to make sandbox posts "finished". I agree with not being lazy though. I see this post as a great example of unlazy and unfinished (when posted). There was clearly effort made, and it was made available for feedback early, which can avoid going too far down a path that others already know won't work. Posting early prunes impossible or impractical challenges so challenge authors have more time for writing the challenges that will make it to main. | |
| Jul 11, 2018 at 3:46 | comment | added | user202729 | @trichoplax Not everyone think so. | |
| Jul 10, 2018 at 19:43 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | It's great to see an unfinished idea, ready for feedback until it's postable. I see this as an important purpose of the sandbox. | |
| Jul 10, 2018 at 19:08 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1313 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 18:24 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 136 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 17:37 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 34 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 4:48 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 4:40 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 4:20 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 822 characters in body
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 4:11 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 822 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2018 at 3:19 | comment | added | Wheat Wizard Mod | @Nathaniel When I actually finish it this will be the next installment of proof-golf. | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 2:31 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 308 characters in body
|
| Jul 8, 2018 at 2:06 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 401 characters in body
|
| Jul 7, 2018 at 7:02 | comment | added | N. Virgo | This is quite interesting (not sarcasm!), but what's the actual challenge? | |
| Jul 5, 2018 at 9:54 | comment | added | user202729 | @tsh Currently there is still no winning criteria. | |
| Jul 5, 2018 at 7:23 | comment | added | tsh | Proofs could be simple: it supports NAND, and NAND is functionally complete. | |
| Jul 5, 2018 at 4:21 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 58 characters in body
|
| Jul 5, 2018 at 4:06 | history | edited | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| Jul 5, 2018 at 3:41 | history | answered | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |