Timeline for If "fewest instructions" in Assembly is a valid question type
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2018 at 9:10 | comment | added | user202729 | @mbomb007 But not all languages are "small"... | |
| Jul 8, 2018 at 2:12 | comment | added | mbomb007 | All languages are "made-up" | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 6:46 | comment | added | user202729 | @mbomb007 Looking at OP's past challenge and challenges in the sandbox, it looks like that it's not the case. | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 4:52 | comment | added | user202729 | @mbomb007 I suppose OP was talking about x86 assembly. For small made-up languages (or Turing tarpit) they're more well-received (because they're easier to learn) | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 18:10 | comment | added | mbomb007 | @user202729 If you're talking about Assembly, it depends on the type. There are simple assembly types, such as Redcode that have gotten good responses. | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 4:23 | vote | accept | Lance Pollard | ||
| Jul 6, 2018 at 4:22 | comment | added | user202729 | @LancePollard Although it's on-topic I think that there won't be too many participants, because not many people know that language. | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 3:55 | history | answered | Wheat WizardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |