Timeline for Sandbox for Proposed Challenges
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2019 at 22:23 | comment | added | dfeuer | I think your idea is good, but the details are pretty vague. | |
| Mar 19, 2019 at 8:52 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | The spec is completely opaque to me. It should be written without assuming any aerofoil-specific knowledge, not as a refresher for someone who already knew it but may have forgotten. | |
| Mar 17, 2019 at 22:33 | comment | added | JPeroutek |
There are well-defined equations relating the x and y coordinates, so perhaps submissions could return a set of (x,y) points, and they could be judged by how closely the entire set of points follows the profile lines?
|
|
| Mar 17, 2019 at 22:32 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | ... criterion isn't just code golf, then I recommend using the code-challenge tag, since code-golf implies a pure golfing competition. | |
| Mar 17, 2019 at 22:31 | comment | added | Erik the Outgolfer | What are you trying to achieve with popularity-contest? I highly recommend against using it unless you really know what you're doing, most of such challenges are closed as too broad (popularity-contest isn't a broadness waiver). On the other hand, code-golf is the most common winning criterion around here, so I highly recommend it. There are other issues, however, which make the challenge unclear. For example, what constitutes a valid plot image (including how axes, lines, areas and points can be represented)? How would the answer be judged on its accuracy? If the winning... | |
| Mar 17, 2019 at 22:24 | history | edited | JPeroutek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 50 characters in body
|
| Mar 17, 2019 at 22:18 | history | answered | JPeroutek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |