Timeline for Sandbox for Proposed Challenges
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2019 at 17:57 | history | edited | Giuseppe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
effect -> affect
|
| Jun 22, 2019 at 22:26 | comment | added | Shaggy |
I agree with @FryAmTheEggman; the core of both challenges is identical. The only real difference here is having to filter the Ps which is a trivial modification for most languages. Having said that, though, I wouldn't swing my hammer at this until a few solutions had been posted, in the hope that I would be proven wrong.
|
|
| Jun 21, 2019 at 21:03 | comment | added | FryAmTheEggman | It is possible that I'm being too harsh, but I don't think I am. The only real problem with the other question compared to this one is the rounding, which could basically just be dropped from the answers. While I agree that this isn't identical, I don't think it has enough reason to exist as even with the +/- grades it's still just looking up values then applying a weighted average. It is certainly possible that I am in the minority, but I think my skepticism should encourage you to find other people's opinions before posting. | |
| Jun 21, 2019 at 20:24 | comment | added | user0721090601 | @FryAmTheEggman Between filtering, vastly different input/output (all of which could/would significantly modify entries — the input/output in particular was a strong criticism of the one you linked to), I think it's sufficiently different and golfed answers wouldn't be trivially different. But in any case, I asked about feeding in +/- or arbitrary grades which absolutely would be a totally different question. Perhaps instead of being dismissive, you could be constructive. | |
| Jun 21, 2019 at 20:06 | comment | added | FryAmTheEggman |
I disagree, solutions can just filter out all the grades with P and then exactly reuse the result from the question I linked. Unless I've missed something that definitely fits in the criteria for being a duplicate.
|
|
| Jun 21, 2019 at 20:03 | comment | added | user0721090601 | @FryAmTheEggman not a dupe. This one adds the P which makes it a good bit more complciated. | |
| Jun 21, 2019 at 20:01 | comment | added | FryAmTheEggman | Dupe | |
| Jun 21, 2019 at 5:49 | history | answered | user0721090601 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |