Timeline for Sandbox for Proposed Challenges
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2022 at 1:59 | history | edited | lyxal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3379 characters in body
|
| Aug 31, 2022 at 8:07 | comment | added | lyxal | @CommandMaster I updated the challenge to clarify adjacency matrices don't need the domain - only taking the relation as a set needs a domain input | |
| Aug 30, 2022 at 23:32 | history | edited | lyxal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 84 characters in body
|
| Aug 30, 2022 at 8:49 | comment | added | pajonk | @CommandMaster I think It's default that you may omit inputs you don't need. | |
| Aug 30, 2022 at 8:15 | history | edited | Command Master | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed typo in the word "adjacency"
|
| Aug 30, 2022 at 8:14 | comment | added | Command Master | This seems to favor taking the relation as an adjacency matrix, since if you do that you can ignore the input domain. Can you choose to not take a domain, if you take an adjacency matrix? | |
| Aug 30, 2022 at 6:36 | comment | added | lyxal |
@CommandMaster no, because the relation may not be reflexive - it may not have (a, a) for all a in the domain
|
|
| Aug 30, 2022 at 4:22 | comment | added | Command Master | Do you have to explicitly take the domain? Can you assume all values in the domain appear at least once in the relation? | |
| Aug 26, 2022 at 14:08 | history | edited | lyxal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Aug 26, 2022 at 13:58 | history | answered | lyxal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |