Timeline for Sandbox for Proposed Challenges
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 20, 2022 at 0:03 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4064 characters in body
|
Sep 19, 2022 at 10:31 | comment | added | pxeger | @Bubbler Wow, I'm not good at reading. | |
Sep 19, 2022 at 10:30 | comment | added | Bubbler | @pxeger "Given a nonempty string s consisting of uppercase letters..." | |
Sep 19, 2022 at 4:17 | comment | added | Bubbler | @DLosc I changed the string task to one that involves string replacement. Does it look better? | |
Sep 19, 2022 at 4:15 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
Sep 19, 2022 at 0:16 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 62 characters in body
|
Sep 16, 2022 at 19:20 | comment | added | DLosc | One concern I have about the string task is that it seems relatively easy in a language like BQN, which treats strings as arrays of characters and is good at manipulating arrays. I wouldn't think of BQN as being a good language for string-handling, though. Maybe the string task should involve more of the standard string-manipulation builtins like case conversion, search-and-replace, etc. | |
Sep 15, 2022 at 1:06 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 186 characters in body
|
Sep 14, 2022 at 23:28 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 186 characters in body
|
Sep 14, 2022 at 23:05 | history | edited | DLosc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo
|
Sep 14, 2022 at 22:55 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 317 characters in body
|
Sep 13, 2022 at 9:57 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
Sep 13, 2022 at 9:53 | comment | added | Bubbler | @alephalpha Yes. | |
Sep 13, 2022 at 9:51 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 115 characters in body
|
Sep 13, 2022 at 9:41 | comment | added | alephalpha | May I take input as a list of characters for the string task? | |
Sep 13, 2022 at 5:42 | history | edited | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Sep 13, 2022 at 5:24 | comment | added | emanresu A | The thing is, lenguage is quite easy to golf down due to how its encoding works and it'd require a lot of diligence to create one that's almost certainly optimal. The longer you make a solution, the more potential there is for it to be smaller. | |
Sep 13, 2022 at 5:02 | history | answered | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |