Timeline for Sandbox for Proposed Challenges
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2023 at 8:17 | history | edited | RubenVerg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
published question
|
| Dec 4, 2023 at 9:30 | history | edited | RubenVerg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarify behavior when not enough arguments are on the stack
|
| Dec 2, 2023 at 16:45 | comment | added | RubenVerg | @bsoelch Bounded integers are fine (but maybe specify if it's a very low bound), and you can input them in whatever way you like. Instructions can be not atomic as long as they're deterministic. | |
| Dec 2, 2023 at 16:04 | comment | added | bsoelch |
Can the instructions be represented as a sequence of smaller instructions? Can I for example have an an instruction # that pops two numbers and pushes the sum and difference and then define addition as #drop and subtraction as # swap drop or do all operations have to be atomic
|
|
| Dec 2, 2023 at 15:20 | comment | added | bsoelch | Would it be allowed to only support integers in some bounded interval (e.g. 32-bit integers), or do you require support for arbitrary size integers? Is the integer format required to be decimal or would unary integers be allowed? | |
| Dec 2, 2023 at 8:14 | history | edited | RubenVerg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarify swap instruction
|
| Dec 2, 2023 at 3:15 | comment | added | Bbrk24 | I am definitely trying this in Trilangle if/when it's posted. Maybe give me a couple weeks because it's exam week, but | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 17:27 | comment | added | Philippos | Agreed! »opposite order« is the clearest. | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 13:53 | comment | added | RubenVerg | @Philippos would "and push them so that they are in opposite order" be better? woudln't change it to "and push them in the same order" which would definitely make it more confusing | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 13:51 | comment | added | Philippos | »and push them in the opposite order (swap)« strictly thought, they are not pushed in the opposite order: A swap pushes the value first that was popped first. But I doubt this will be misunderstood by anyone. (-; | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 8:16 | history | edited | RubenVerg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Reverse stack in examples
|
| Dec 1, 2023 at 6:20 | comment | added | Philippos | I suggest to represent the stack in a left=bottom/right=top manner, like it is typically done in every stack based language I know. | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 6:08 | comment | added | RubenVerg |
@ATaco No, I think eval for stack languages would still be interesting. How am I supposed to mark the winning criteria?
|
|
| Dec 1, 2023 at 1:48 | comment | added | ATaco |
Do you plan to prevent stack based languages just eval'ing it? Also, what's the Winning Criteria..? code-golf?
|
|
| Nov 30, 2023 at 19:20 | history | answered | RubenVerg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |