Timeline for Definitive policy about answers not meeting the challenge specification
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 25, 2017 at 1:57 | comment | added | Dennis Mod | A +8/-8 answer is a rare edge case, precisly because that answer was already controversial when it was posted. I agree that most standard loopholes should not apply retroactively, but I also think that outsourcing the real answer is one of those that should. | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 0:53 | comment | added | Johannes Kuhn | Also by little you mean something like 54 reputation? | |
| Jan 25, 2017 at 0:49 | comment | added | Johannes Kuhn | I disagree. There are answers out there that predate the common loopholes and thous have been valid at the time they have been written, so the rules have changed. | |
| Jan 12, 2016 at 2:23 | history | answered | DennisMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |