Timeline for Undeserved chat suspension
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2016 at 0:38 | comment | added | Alex A. Mod | @PeterTaylor Assuming you weren't being facetious again just now, off-topic chatter isn't deserving of a suspension; rude, inappropriate, or otherwise abusive content and/or conduct is, as is abuse of flags. The Nineteenth Byte has a lot off off-topic content but is generally well behaved in terms of the other things. Things are on topic occasionally, certainly more than 1% of the time, just not 100%. | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 21:39 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | @AlexA., I was being slightly facetious, but if a few more suspensions were dished out for rambling off-topic chat then the 19th hole might not have ended up with a signal-to-noise ratio which seemed to be around 1% the last time I was there. | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 16:38 | comment | added | Alex A. Mod | @PeterTaylor Granted, in general there's a significant difference between inappropriate content, which warrants flags, and off topic content, which is simply irrelevant to the site. | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 13:31 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | Looks inappropriate to me. What does it have to do with code golf, programming puzzles, or any on-topic subject? | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 8:30 | comment | added | user42643 | You joke about the cosmic rays, but that's actually a greater security concern than most people think ;-) | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 8:30 | answer | added | Jon EricsonStaff | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 8:04 | history | asked | user45941 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |