Timeline for We're not a Q&A site. But what should be done about it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 31, 2016 at 9:41 | comment | added | Martin Ender Mod | This would also be interesting in terms of completely collaborative answers. That's something that doesn't usually happen on a regular Q&A site, but for a tricky challenge it's not too uncommon for several people to work on a single answer together. | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 22:41 | history | edited | Cyoce | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Mar 30, 2016 at 22:22 | comment | added | Cyoce | @MartinBüttner good point! I added that to the post. | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 22:22 | history | edited | Cyoce | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 90 characters in body
|
| Mar 30, 2016 at 22:15 | comment | added | Martin Ender Mod | This sounds like a nice idea provided that the original author's approval is necessary. Otherwise it comes with the same problems as suggested edits. | |
| Mar 30, 2016 at 22:01 | history | answered | Cyoce | CC BY-SA 3.0 |