The tag is only used in two questions, has no wiki, and the questions are both tagged .

These questions are asked by 2 different users. Here they are:

There are two options this question covers:

  • Burninate or synonimize with , because the tag is not useful at all.
  • Make tag wiki, because this tag has a use, but it is not well-documented.

If not the first, the second option should apply, because what is this tag for?

EDIT: The tag seems to have been burninated.

| |
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ AKA "The feasibility of [feasibility]". \$\endgroup\$ – Geobits Sep 29 '16 at 19:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DJMcMayhem When I made this question, I was about to shut my PC off, so there was no time for improving. \$\endgroup\$ – Erik the Outgolfer Sep 30 '16 at 11:30
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ @EriktheGolfer There was no need to post answers at all in the first place. If you don't have time to make a proper answer, then simply don't. There's nothing wrong with that. \$\endgroup\$ – Martin Ender Sep 30 '16 at 11:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Geobits No, nothing like that at all. It should be "The usefulness of [feasibility]". But, your suggestion is at the very least humorous enough. \$\endgroup\$ – Erik the Outgolfer Sep 30 '16 at 11:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MartinEnder These are kind of "draft answers", i.e. answers that belong to me but are not fully complete yet. I know I should have added some detail like "Draft answer, please bear with it." Or, just let others post their own arguings? Edit: Added more detail to everything now. But, I just got on my PC, so it might still not be perfect. \$\endgroup\$ – Erik the Outgolfer Sep 30 '16 at 11:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .