As you may or may not have noticed, we are doing a series of Brain-Flak Birthday challenges to celebrate Brain-Flak's first birthday.

Some questions in this series are only tangentially related to brain-flak by the aspect (and that's fine they're still interesting challenges). There has been a difference in opinion on whether these challenges should be marked with among us flakkers, so I thought I would ask the meta.

Is it useful to mark all BFBCs with the tag? Should we do so?


1 Answer 1



Let's take a look at the tag wiki.

This challenge is related to the Brain-flak esoteric language and 
languages based on Brain-Flak. 
Note that challenges that require the answers to be in a specific language are generally discouraged

I feel in some sense you may have answered your own question. These challenges are related to Brain-Flak. While it may be somewhat tangential of a relationship it still is beneficial. Tags serve to categorize questions and help users locate questions they find interesting. It is likely that Brain-Flak aficionados (who watch this tag) may find these questions interesting, therefore I do believe it is useful to have them categorized (and if they don't find it interesting they can always continue to scroll past it).

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Hehe Brian-Flak sounds like a great spin-off language ;) \$\endgroup\$
    – Beta Decay
    Apr 30, 2017 at 12:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ @BetaDecay Maybe a cross between Brian & Chuck and Brain-Flak. \$\endgroup\$
    – mbomb007
    May 1, 2017 at 18:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .