1
\$\begingroup\$

This question already has an answer here:

A collegue of me just suggested, I could just invent my own language for every problem in code-golfs.

Now my question is, is it ok, if I just say I gonna invent a language for exactly this one problem and the interpreter can be found here?

\$\endgroup\$

marked as duplicate by ProgramFOX, Kyle Kanos, Martin Ender, Geobits, John Dvorak Jun 5 '14 at 16:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ This is in the standard loopholes - things in this list are generally looked down upon and are almost always downvoted. \$\endgroup\$ – kitcar2000 Jun 5 '14 at 15:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ @kitcar2000 It doesn't belong to the standard loopholes if the language is a general-purpose language, a language that people can use for a wide range of programming problems, as Chris said in his answer. It would not be allowed to use your language if it is created after a challenge is posted. \$\endgroup\$ – ProgramFOX Jun 5 '14 at 15:54
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @ProgramFOX "if I just say I gonna invent a language for exactly this one problem" implies that it is for a specific question. \$\endgroup\$ – kitcar2000 Jun 5 '14 at 15:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ @kitcar2000: Oops, I missed that. I'm sorry. \$\endgroup\$ – ProgramFOX Jun 5 '14 at 15:58

Browse other questions tagged .