Asked the first two users listed as voting to close what part of the question is not clear to them, to which no reply has been posted.
Putting @username in a comment doesn't always notify the user. I'm not sure of the exact list of behaviours which make a user available to be pinged like that, but empirically it doesn't include casting a close vote, because I was not notified of your comment.
Am considering re-asking the question, though before doing so am seeking clarification here as to what part of the question could use improvement.
We have a process for asking how a question could be improved. Full details in How does the Sandbox work? How do I use it? . Rather than re-ask the question I suggest that you copy its content to an answer in the sandbox, self-delete the question, and then after the sandboxing process is over edit the original question and undelete. If it doesn't get reopened in a reasonable period (12 hours, say) then post in chat and you'll probably get enough reopen votes.
Finally, although this meta question isn't tagged specific-question, let me say that I didn't comment on what specifically was unclear about the question because I can't succinctly point to one thing which is unclear. The whole question seems to me to be a complicated mess, and I can't untangle which parts are directly relevant vs context for why the core question is interesting. IMO it needs a TL;DR which is no more than a quarter of the length of the current question and which stands alone and contains a full specification.
