I've got an idea for a team based challenge, where entries will choose the team to participate on, and teams will compete against each other.
I don't want to get into the details much here, so let's keep it somewhat vague and high-level. If I can't determine a good way to pick a single winning entry, is this allowed? Which team wins will be strict and objective, but it won't be clear which single member was the best on the team.
Various suggestions have been proposed in chat to somewhat objectively identify a single clear winner, but in my opinion they would all either create a "gaming" condition or increase the runtime significantly. By "gaming", I mean that the win conditions for a single player could conflict with the winning conditions for the team.
I know the SE framework in general frowns on questions that can't garner a single objectively-best answer, but I believe this could be a good addition to the site. We don't see teamwork challenges here, and I think it would be a fun way to compete. It would be modeled most like a King of the Hill competition, but I think that either a change to the tag wiki or a new tag/genre altogether would be warranted.
Before writing the controller, I'd like to know whether this would be acceptable. If absolutely necessary, I could convert the challenge to a 1v1 round robin tournament, but I feel that would take away from the spirit of the challenge.