0
\$\begingroup\$

As you probably know, there is a Sandbox meta post for users to post potential Code Golf posts. Users can get advice and have their post reviewed with meta votes.

I want to know when the biggest meta review feedback vs actually posting on the main site feedback difference happened.

For example, a post reviewed with 5 upvotes on meta got -5 downvotes on the main site.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ This seems like it’ll be very difficult to find. Most challenges with a negative score go on to be deleted, so you’re unlikely to find challenges than went positive -> negative, and people very rarely post challenges with a low/negative score in the Sandbox (and the vast majority that do tend to be downvoted and deleted). On top of all that, not every links their Sandbox posts to the main posts, so some pairs will be very difficult to match up \$\endgroup\$ – caird coinheringaahing Oct 30 '20 at 0:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ The most significant things I remember are challenges that got a few upvotes quickly in the sandbox and then on being (usually prematurely) posted were closed as unclear, and never managed to get off the ground. Generally upvotes in the sandbox are fairly meaningless - only the feedback really matters. \$\endgroup\$ – FryAmTheEggman Oct 30 '20 at 15:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .