2
\$\begingroup\$

According to this post, three temp moderators will be selected in about 2 weeks. Who would like to nominate themselves?

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

6
\$\begingroup\$

I am nominating myself, also (and I also support marcog's nomination).

  • I have a great interest in the policy aspects of this site, as can be seen by my meta posts.
  • I'm one of the earliest users on SO, so I've seen a lot as far as how a Stack Exchange site's culture evolves.
  • I've run the third-most popular code golf (by number of upvotes) on SO. :-P

Clearly, I'm invested in code golf. I also have interest in other code challenges (and I plan to post some soon), so, I'm not playing favourites here. If you love coding brain-twisters, I look forward to helping you twist your brain as much as it can handle! :-)

† This by itself required some creativity (as did my getting userid 3 on this site), so I see this as a sign of my interest in solving outside-the-square problems. :-)

‡ Ask me if you're curious. :-P

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 You've been very active on meta. \$\endgroup\$
    – moinudin
    Jan 28, 2011 at 19:27
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I second your nomination. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy
    Feb 2, 2011 at 15:47
4
\$\begingroup\$

I would like to nominate myself. I am a 14k SO user so I have experience with SE sites, and while this is my first involvement in a beta site I have a great interest in making it work out. I am one of the top users on the [algorithm] tag on SO, which I feel is very related to this site's purpose. Although this is early stages, I have already posted 9 of the 20 questions on meta and 7 meta answers. I have posted a couple experimental questions on the main site. I also currently have the highest rep, although it's far too early for this to be meaningful.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ You also seem to want to penalize people for doing nothing wrong: meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/25/… - I vote no. \$\endgroup\$
    – Crazy Eddie
    Jan 28, 2011 at 17:36
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @Noah Please read my reply to your comment there. That question clearly opened up an issue we're currently facing. I have no intention of penalising people for doing nothing wrong, but I do have see the need to discuss what is necessary. \$\endgroup\$
    – moinudin
    Jan 28, 2011 at 17:41
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I second @marcog's nomination. \$\endgroup\$
    – JPvdMerwe
    Jan 28, 2011 at 22:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ I second your nomination. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy
    Feb 2, 2011 at 15:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .