10
\$\begingroup\$

Almost all of our challenges on PPCG have the implied rule of no standard loopholes. However, I have seen many answers (mainly from new users) that contain some of these standard loopholes. Should we feature the standard loophole thread to allow for easier accessing of the information to new and curious users, and lower the chance of these invalid answers?

\$\endgroup\$
19
\$\begingroup\$

Yes, via FAQ Hub thread

Similar to Mego's answer, but why not feature the FAQ hub thread, as all of the FAQ threads need more visibility.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Side note: Should we add default I/O methods to the FAQ Hub? \$\endgroup\$ – GamrCorps Nov 14 '15 at 5:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think the fewer things that are featured at once, the better. Thus it makes more sense to me to feature this, which is a collection of resources, rather than a single resource. \$\endgroup\$ – Alex A. Nov 14 '15 at 7:59
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Adding the I/O defaults to the FAQ hub isn't necessary because it's been incorporated into the code golf tag wiki. \$\endgroup\$ – Alex A. Nov 14 '15 at 8:05
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ So the answer is not "Yes". It's "No, it should be part of the FAQ instead." \$\endgroup\$ – corsiKa Nov 20 '15 at 18:23
6
\$\begingroup\$

Yes

More visibility for that thread is good. I would also suggest making the default I/O methods post featured as well. The meta featured posts could become sort of a newbie center, since we apparently can't modify the tour.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .