-14
\$\begingroup\$

In case the image doesn't appear, this is the body of the question: Hello I have quetions how does juice an avocado I have try for thirtee minut and no juic. I try alredy. thank.

This question has historical significance, but it is not considered a good, on-topic question for this site, just as said on locked questions. Does it deserve to be undeleted and locked for good?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 10
    \$\begingroup\$ "This question has historical significance." No it doesn't. \$\endgroup\$ – Martin Ender Jun 28 '16 at 16:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ What about link to the question? \$\endgroup\$ – Qwertiy Jun 28 '16 at 16:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Qwertiy The question is deleted. \$\endgroup\$ – user48538 Jun 28 '16 at 16:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ @zyabin101, anyway, starting from some rep it becomes visible by direct link. \$\endgroup\$ – Qwertiy Jun 28 '16 at 16:59
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ When I saw this, I literally laughed for a minute and downvoted \$\endgroup\$ – Blue Jun 28 '16 at 17:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ AFAIK, It's more of a chat meme than anything else.... so no \$\endgroup\$ – Bald Bantha Jun 28 '16 at 17:13
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I like how the "question about question about avocado" has more downvotes than the question about avocado. \$\endgroup\$ – Joe Jul 12 '16 at 23:03
27
\$\begingroup\$

No

Seriously though, historical locks are for questions that were on topic once, but became off topic due to a change in the site's scope. That's not the case here.

Also, undeleting the question would send the message that this kind of prank is acceptable. That's also not the case; the user (sock) who posted that question was deleted for spamming the site.

And all the chatter about avocados really needs to stop...

\$\endgroup\$
  • 15
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 for the gif. And because I agree with the answer, but mostly because of the gif. \$\endgroup\$ – DJMcMayhem Jun 28 '16 at 17:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can we undelete and lock it to make it show up on suggested dupes? I recently closed/downvoted/flagged/commented on yet another copy of this question. \$\endgroup\$ – NoOneIsHere Aug 7 '16 at 3:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ @NoOneIsHere As I said in my answer, it doesn't meet the requirements for a historical lock. Just flag it for moderator attention, and we'll remove it and deal with the poster. \$\endgroup\$ – Dennis Aug 7 '16 at 3:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Dennis there isn't other lock types? \$\endgroup\$ – NoOneIsHere Aug 7 '16 at 3:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ @NoOneIsHere Yes, but none that fits here. The closest one would be content dispute, but there's nothing to dispute here. Seriously, we don't need a dupe target for something that is not on topic, not a question, but pretty much vandalism. You couldn't close it as duplicate anyway; the original question would have to get an answer with a positive score first. \$\endgroup\$ – Dennis Aug 7 '16 at 3:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .