This question already has an answer here:

I find that generally questions are answered by the same few users, with the same few languages. Is it a good idea to disallow dedicated golfing languages, to make the challenge fairer and more interesting?

Note: I have attempted this and got heavily downvoted.


marked as duplicate by Mego, Community Jul 11 '16 at 1:41

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



Any language that is Turing complete can add numbers and check if a number is prime is valid on PPCG, and since most golfing languages are Turing complete, they can do so.

Also, banning them only makes sense if you compare between languages, and comparing between languages doesn't make sense at all.

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ We actually don't require Turing completeness; we only require that the language can add numbers and check for primality. See here. \$\endgroup\$ – Alex A. Jul 11 '16 at 1:32

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .